2012/1/30 Alex Valavanis <valavanisalex@...400...>:
There are only two remaining open bugs that are tagged for 0.48.3 milestone[1,2]. Are we planning to backport any of the remaining "backport-proposed" bugs?[3] Is it worth having a mini backporting-sprint? (...) [3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bugs?field.tag=backport-proposed
I have fixed the following bugs in the stable branch:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/167419 https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/168942 https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/184341 https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/239430 https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/340123 https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/663667 https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/810503 https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/834721 https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/889172
There are 7 remaining "backport-proposed" bugs. One of them is the unfixed bug about extensions on OSX, which I can't work on.* The other 6 are related WMF/EMF export and all have fixes in trunk. I will try to backport the WMF/EMF fixes shortly.
The fix for #810503 and #834721 introduces new translatable strings. I think it's worth fixing these bugs even if this causes a few untranslated messages to appear. Tell me if you think these fixes should be reverted.
I also have a GTK update ready that I haven't committed to the devlibs yet, which reportedly should solve tablet problems. This will go in before I start working on the WMF/EMF bugs.
*) What is our position on the legality of OSX virtualization for personal use?
Regards, Krzysztof