On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:39:54PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 01:28:58PM -0500, Aaron Spike wrote:
Because we have three extremely qualified candidates with whom many of us have become friends, there is now a request that we allow voting in private so that no feelings get stepped upon.
The three nominees are qualified in fairly different ways. I think all nominees would recognize that each of the other two is arguably the best choice, and thus we needn't feel rejected or unappreciated if not selected.
The point about board work taking time away from other contributions means that not being selected is actually a vote of confidence in the value of not distracting us from our other work :) .
Just thought it worth reminding nominees before the final vote is known; and perhaps reassuring voters too.
pjrm.