26 Feb
2016
26 Feb
'16
12:24 a.m.
On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 00:56 +0100, Maren Hachmann wrote:
(and, honestly, I haven't even looked at the other code in that extension... Unfortunately, my pull request to the original author from November last year hasn't been answered... :/ )
Is the licence (GPL3+) a problem? I can't change it.
There's existing GPLv3 code in there and as an extension isn't not so bad as long as the code is well labeled with a license header.
I think we effectively have a GPLv3 codebase which a majority GPLv2 and some other compatibles here and there (correct me if I've wrong)
Best Regards, Martin Owens