19 Dec
2004
19 Dec
'04
9:33 p.m.
bulia byak wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 13:11:54 -0800, Jon A. Cruz <jon@...18...> wrote:
For example, if we have <foo:image ...> and <bar:path ...> in the same doc, as long as foo and bar both are defined to the same svg namespace, shouldn't we work properly
Of course.
and even preserve those prefixes?
Would be nice, but I think it's pretty low priority.
Actually, I think it's a higher priority, as it goes to underlying internal structure. Often converting a namespace-naive program into a namespace-saavy one after the fact can be quite a task. On the other hand, keeping the final goal in mind early on can greatly reduce the work.
Trust me, I've hit this issue myself.