On 22/06/2012 16:30, ~suv wrote:
On 22/06/2012 02:46, Josh Andler wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 1:11 PM, ~suv <suv-sf@...58...> wrote:
P.S. The Windows packages are not complete for 0.48.3.1 either: no zip|7z archives nor debug files. Are there plans to upload a second set of packages (including the installer) based on the current devlibs - before making an announcement? IIUC there have been a few changes since the first installer build for 0.48.3.1 was created in late February.
Thanks for bringing this up. Win32 devs and ~suv, how do you feel about using current devlibs with the release as opposed to based on the rev the existing installer used? I'm not sure if any regressions were introduced or anything.
I'm not aware we had regressions (based on recent trunk builds) reported in the bug tracker which seem related to the latest changes in the devlibs (r29-r31 primarily fixed build failures of current trunk).
Whether the update of cairomm from 1.8.10 to 1.10.0 has any positive (or negative) side-effects for 0.48.x builds I can't tell.
Correction (typo):
cairomm was updated from 1.8.4 to 1.10.0 (r30)