![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/eb3fe37da4a199eb4e3b479d8a57f808.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Thu, 24 May 2007 09:04:44 -0700, Ted Gould <ted@...11...> wrote:
I don't see where it says that switch should be treated as a group:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-SVG11-20030114/struct.html#SwitchElement
Am I missing something?
No, not at all. It's just that implementing it as a group seems to be the minimal fallback position over not rendering it at all -- but that looks like a moot point; as, since I wrote that, I tried switch with Inkscape, librsvg, and gecko, and it worked fine in all three cases.
Well, when is the vector effects module expected? Before 0.46?
I don't think we can expect a final standard before 0.46. It's worth noting that they are more likely to release it if there are more prototype implementations which prove the concept (e.g. ours).
Can we ask for that one and flow text first?
Yes, I'll be getting into that soon on the SVG mailing list as a side thread to the gradient mesh discussion.
I guess an interesting question is: should they be the same UI?
Possibly, yeah. Or at least something very close. The main distinction is that a vector effect is its own object, whereas filter effects are attached to other existing objects.
-mental