An advantage of GitHub that was not mentioned here is Travis CI, which allows to run unit tests before merging every branch.

GitLab also has a CI solution, but its public runner servers do not support C++ - we would need to self-host that part.

Best regards, Krzysztof

On Jan 6, 2017 01:42, "Martin Owens" <doctormo@...400...> wrote:
On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 10:24 +0100, Olof Bjarnason wrote:
> What about moving one small repo to github and another to gitlab so
> more eyeballs get to see both?

I see that metric as a bit biased. We know Github is the monopoly de-
jure, so just by force of numbers it'll discount any other concerns or
benefits in favour of one.

Do we really have a lack of eyeballs? Inkscape is insanely popular
already. What we need is better tools, not just the most popular one.

Martin,

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Inkscape-devel mailing list
Inkscape-devel@...1656...784...sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel