Aaron Spike wrote:
Ben Fowler wrote:
On 22/05/06, Aaron Spike <aaron@...749...> wrote:
Bryce Harrington wrote:
This is a critical step for being able to start doing pre-releases during the bugfix phase, so any help on getting make distcheck to pass will be very important.
Sorry I carelessly replaced the URL Bryce linked above. I guess that is ok, because my problem with distcheck changed. Now I getting the long strand of "What GTK?" type errors similar to those seen below. This error resulted from the changes Ralf made in revision 11886. It looks harmless enough to me, but now I can't even build autopackages.
http://svn.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.cgi/inkscape/inkscape/trunk/configure.ac?...
Ok, this must be some issue with the way these macros work. The patch below works for me. Can anyone explain why?
Aaron Spike
Index: configure.ac =================================================================== --- configure.ac (revision 11886) +++ configure.ac (working copy) @@ -495,10 +495,10 @@ dnl *** NOTE: when we move to gtk 2.6 or later, we can remove the dnl ********* the override for g_ascii_strtod below... dnl sigc++-2.0 >= 2.0.12: using "visit_each" not available in 2.0.10 -PKG_CHECK_MODULES(INKSCAPE, gdkmm-2.4 glibmm-2.4 gtkmm-2.4 gtk+-2.0
= 2.4.0 libxml-2.0 >= 2.6.11 libxslt >= 1.0.15 sigc++-2.0 >= 2.0.11
$ink_spell_pkg gthread-2.0 >= 2.0) - if test $cc_vers_major -gt 3; then - PKG_CHECK_MODULES(INKSCAPE, sigc++-2.0 >= 2.0.12) + PKG_CHECK_MODULES(INKSCAPE, gdkmm-2.4 glibmm-2.4 gtkmm-2.4 gtk+-2.0 >= 2.4.0 libxml-2.0 >= 2.6.11 libxslt >= 1.0.15 sigc++-2.0
= 2.0.12 $ink_spell_pkg gthread-2.0 >= 2.0)
+else + PKG_CHECK_MODULES(INKSCAPE, gdkmm-2.4 glibmm-2.4 gtkmm-2.4 gtk+-2.0 >= 2.4.0 libxml-2.0 >= 2.6.11 libxslt >= 1.0.15 sigc++-2.0
= 2.0.11 $ink_spell_pkg gthread-2.0 >= 2.0)
fi
dnl Shouldn't we test for libpng and libz?