On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 13:20 +0100, Eric Greveson wrote:
Thoughts from those who might be able to approve any future merge requests I make? My preference is for option c), but if a Boost dependency would be frowned upon for any reason, then option a) would be next on my list.
Option e) have an idx specify it uses dbus and pass the desktop's dbus address and the addresses/ids of selected objects only. Disable script if dbus support not compiled in.
Certainly what I would go for considering the advantages of not having to care too much about the script's language. It could even be compiled C, C++, Vala or Java. (for those that want to make things hard ;-))
Some improvements to the DBus api, good signals etc and it might be worth quite a bit to allowing our extensions more latitude.
Martin,