2 Jan
2010
2 Jan
'10
4:05 a.m.
On Jan 1, 2010, at 7:45 PM, bulia byak wrote:
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Guy Brand <gb@...2297...> wrote:
The provisional suggestion is to modify document-subset.cpp by moving the "records.erase(obj);" line to just before the "removed_signal.emit(obj);" line.
This change fixes the layer issue I was facing.
so should we commit this? any potential issues?
Yes. I'd actually thought it was committed, otherwise I would have.
At the moment I'm hooking in a filter bit to prevent "inkscape:*" attributes from sneaking into our plain SVG output. Once I finish that I was going to check and commit for pjrm.