I will say as much as I want a FLOSS solution, it's not a religious issue for me. I lean towards GitHub because of the larger pool of developers and Travis CI integration (not something I've used personally, but heard a lot of positive reports on).
Cheers, Josh
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Krzysztof Kosiński <tweenk.pl@...1063....> wrote:
An advantage of GitHub that was not mentioned here is Travis CI, which allows to run unit tests before merging every branch.
GitLab also has a CI solution, but its public runner servers do not support C++ - we would need to self-host that part.
Best regards, Krzysztof
On Jan 6, 2017 01:42, "Martin Owens" <doctormo@...400...> wrote:
On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 10:24 +0100, Olof Bjarnason wrote:
What about moving one small repo to github and another to gitlab so more eyeballs get to see both?
I see that metric as a bit biased. We know Github is the monopoly de- jure, so just by force of numbers it'll discount any other concerns or benefits in favour of one.
Do we really have a lack of eyeballs? Inkscape is insanely popular already. What we need is better tools, not just the most popular one.
Martin,
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Inkscape-devel mailing list Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Inkscape-devel mailing list Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel