Hi everyone, in the last month+ I have conducted a tiny survey with a few fresh Inkscape users.<br>A mixture of ethnographic research in design and &#39;papercuts&#39; by mr. Siegel. ;) (<a href="http://davidsiegel.org/one-hundred-paper-cuts/">http://davidsiegel.org/one-hundred-paper-cuts/</a>)<br>
I asked a few colleagues to try using inkscape for some time and put down all the little irritations they find.<br>I tried to systematize the list somewhat, but that could use some more work probably. They are mostly small inconsistencies, unnecessarily complex jargon, etc.<br>
Anyhow, it&#39;s a list of roughly 100+ small issues (some with suggested simple corrections), a la:<br><br>    -- Inkscape preferences: Color management: &#39;Black point compensation&#39;, the tip says: &#39;enables black point compensation&#39; not too informative.<br>
    -- Inkscape preferences: Interface. &#39;Enable dynamic relayout&#39;... Technical jargon.<br>    -- Commands Bar: Import: The Tip says: &#39;Import bitmap or SVG into this document&#39; but actually it imports so much more (see import in the file:import)<br>
    -- Text and Font panel: The &#39;Layout&#39; area is a misnomer. Solution: The correct title would be: &#39;Text alignment and direction&#39;. (Alignment being: Left, centered, right, justified. Direction: horizontal/vertical).<br>
...etc.<br><br>What would be the best way to present those?<br>Should I submit them as bugs?<br>Should I try to out down the solution suggestions for the issues, too? <br><br>Thanks.<br><br>Alex.<br>