Reading this thread it came to my mind that there was already an initiative of a group to redesign Inkscape's UI back in 2014.
See https://sourceforge.net/p/inkscape/mailman/message/33145877/ and https://github.com/PIWEEK/rethinkscape.
The people behind this layout had some good ideas and also explained the changes they made.

To me, Amarneethi's layout is also appealing and I welcome the general simplification of the UI. Instead of arguing whether white on dark is good or bad and whether the icons are nice and expressive (that mostly depends on taste; FWIW I personally like both, basically, but would make it optional), I'd say to first discuss the flaws of the current UI and then have a look at how it can be improved, how the two proposed UIs handle those flaws, and whether the changes are technically feasible.
Amarneethi, I agree with Alexandre that it would help people looking at your mockups a lot if you explained the thought process behind it.

Sebastian

PS: Shlomi, Brynn, as you don't like the dark-on-white layout, have a look at Amarneethi's last mockup, which is dark-on-white.


On 6 March 2016 at 18:56, Tobias Ellinghaus <houz@...173...> wrote:
Am Sonntag, 6. März 2016, 18:46:03 schrieb Jabiertxo Arraiza Cenoz:
> Great!
>
> El dom, 06-03-2016 a las 19:32 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine escribió:
> > 5 марта 2016 г. 14:14 пользователь "Jabiertxo Arraiza Cenoz" написал:
> > > Maybe Im on the bad way but I love all GTK widgets changed to HTML
> > > widgets, so changin style is more easy and independent to
> > > programing
> > > layer.

That was already possible with gtkrc files.

> > GTK+3 styling is CSS-based.

Actually it's only a subset of CSS.

> > Alex

Tobias

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Inkscape-devel mailing list
Inkscape-devel@...1794...s.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel