MenTaLguY wrote:
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 09:32 -0700, Joshua A. Andler wrote:
He also said that if he stands at arms length away from the board and tries to do something useful in that small of an increment, it's just not possible and it shouldn't be, some things require getting in close to do detail. Absolute units (with regard to snapping) in Inkscape give him the same "feel" for the scale of things as if he were working in the physical world.
So, it's an issue of the physical analogy making it easier to work with?
I guess so. At least for him since that's what he said. For me, personally, it isn't about physical analogy because 90% of my stuff ends up rasterized... absolute pixels (snapping-wise) in a document with set pixel dimensions just makes more sense while I'm working with it. With my case, perhaps it's more of a raster mentality, but unfortunately Inkscape has kept me trained in this way.
I vote that the conversation be done though... please?
-Josh