![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/516640127f084752aaf5f23c7119f1be.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 18:46 +0200, cabieces julien wrote:
Is there any way to achieve what I want to do? Is there further development forecast for dbus extension? Is this possible to propose eventually patch?
Looking at the move signal code and various comments. It's clear the signals work was not completed. What we have it seems is a test rather than a hack which punts the dbus call from select-conect.cpp to a dbus signal
This is called 'dbus_send_ping' and not 'dbus_object_moved' which would be I think typical of a permanent feature.
Signals are also commented in the proposed interface as not existing and the document interface xml doesn't even mention the single signal we do appear to have.
Over all I think the dbus signal work would need to be picked up and completed properly. At least there's a good starting point for anyone who wants to get involved.
Best Regards, Martin Owens