Hi Alvin,
Sorry to hear of the issues you've been facing.
As a board member, our remit on the board is for project level decisions. We can vote on money, discuss trademark and have only a honorary position when it comes to social leadership.
For technical decisions, the group that decides those is the developers group. Which is pretty wide. But also open to all those who have committed code. We try and reach consensus and try and be considerate. Obviously platform specific issues are a little harder because us Linux devs won't know for sure how the build will be effected for windows.
But your testing is valuable for that at least.
Thanks for your contributions thus far.
Best Regards, Martin Owens
On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 07:08 -0700, alvinpenner wrote:
well, I guess I will never go away completely, Inkscape is after all a very promising program; it is just that the scope of the changes in Inkscape (both the build and the repository and the usage), and the rapidity at which they are being made, is very intimidating to the casual observer like me. It would be nice to have some kind of official position established by the Inkscape board as to what the future holds as far as the build procedure is concerned. Not much point in learning a new repository system and a new build system if they are both going to be obsolete in 6 months from now...
(just a plea for some stability) Alvin
-- View this message in context: http://inkscape.13.x6.nabble.com/Window s-10-cmake-cannot-compile-rev-f80d5b44-tp4980417p4980422.html Sent from the Inkscape - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Inkscape-devel mailing list Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel