21 Jun
2011
21 Jun
'11
10:27 a.m.
Hi,
If you retain the year.month scheme I have the impression that keeping the year as 2011 as opposed to 11 is more self explanatory. Many users could just not realize that 11 is the year and stay using 11.03 until 2015. Sure it's longer.
About month. When will you apply the month number ? when you release ? so it means the release will be nameless until the very last moment and of course what about releasing 2012.01 when you are in december 2011. The benefit of service pack number is that 1 follows 0 whatever occurs.
Sincerely, -Bruno
Bruno Winck Email: bwinck@...2632... Blog: http://www.kneaver.com/blog Kneaver Corp http://www.kneaver.com/ Twitter:http://twitter.com/kneaver SKYPE:brunowinck PH: +1 (415) 749 5850 CELL: +1 (415) 513 3160
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.