Adib,
I have not had a chance to test it. I can see how the change works via skimming the commit log and it seems safe enough to me. If you feel it's safe enough for 0.48.1, please commit in that branch (or if you don't have a checkout, give a "Yes" here and it will be taken care of). Thank you for fixing this! You win a million more magic "Adib fixes stuff no one else wants to" points (redeemable for full food and beverage one day when we meet).
Cheers, Josh
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 7:10 PM, the Adib <theadib@...1439...> wrote:
Josh,
I commited a fix for trunk regarding this bug. let me know if you want me the put this in the 48line.
Adib.
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 5:04 AM, Josh Andler <scislac@...400...> wrote:
Hey all,
Given that I'm thinking a .2 will probably be in order, this is the one bug really holding back .1 from being released at this time. https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/510618
Is anyone willing and able to look into this? If not, the only way that .1 will get out without it is to have someone pledge to fix it for 0.48.2 or 0.49 to be released (whichever makes sense in 4-6 months based on the current rate of progress). If 0.48.1 gets out without this fixed, it will not be avoidable as a fix after that... no exceptions, as unnecessarily hitting the undo-history or dirtying documents is incredibly bad practice.
I hope we have a taker.
Cheers, Josh
Learn how Oracle Real Application Clusters (RAC) One Node allows customers to consolidate database storage, standardize their database environment, and, should the need arise, upgrade to a full multi-node Oracle RAC database without downtime or disruption http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl _______________________________________________ Inkscape-devel mailing list Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel