Hello Martin,
Thursday, October 17, 2013, 3:42:57 PM, you wrote:
On Thu, 2013-10-17 at 09:34 +0200, Jasper van de Gronde wrote:
Yes :) But even then there are quite a few more subtle differences. Still, perhaps it's good to give it another shot.
Hmm;
Maybe we're thinking of two things at the same time? The test suite is clearly more geared towards regressions and reusing the svg tests as a baseline from which to extend to test regressions. This means getting renderings from inkscape is not just a good idea, but vital.
We'd also like to know how close our render is to the real specification. For this we'd need an unmodified set of the svg files (text errors and all) and the results should be more of a percentage similarity so we can see our precision.
I'm convinced these should be separate.
I agree that these are solving different problems and should be separate.