Hello Maren,
I mean instead posting links that will lead to external server and ressources, just post the link on the internal inkscape.org ressources.
Optimal would be the name of the link does not show some username parts. As it appear for personal galleries. I think that could be achieved if the resources are copied to the 0.92pre2 gallery.
Hope that is more clear now.
Regards, Adib. --
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Maren Hachmann <maren@...3165...> wrote:
Am 21.10.2016 um 21:03 schrieb the Adib:
Hello Maren, Hello Martin,
Eduard uploaded some packages to the gallery. He now stuck in the proccess copying to the 0.92pre2 gallery.
The gallery is visible in the "copy to" for "Developers" where he is "Uploader". Pls. adjust Eduards group membership or gallery ownership accordingly.
- Thanks, Adib. I've made Eduard a developer now (well, he already was
one before that, of course ;-), so I assume I didn't overstep there... The developer team admin is Bryce, though).
Maren, Saying that I prefers you refer to the gallery item, so that people can access packages as they are uploaded. similar to https://inkscape.org/en/*developer/galleries/092pre1/ So you avoid having cross server links or dead links.
? Sorry... You mean link to the item via the developer gallery instead of via the user name in the url? Or link to the item view page, instead of directly to the file? Others seem to prefer the direct file link, to me it doesn't matter.
Can you just post the links you'd like to see added to the page (or do it yourself, if you like)? That would be the most unambiguous way ;-)
I can do those updates and the page shuffling that was discussed with Bryce tomorrow, hopefully.
Regards, Maren
Thank you.
Regards,
Adib.