On 9-10-2012 1:04, Johan Engelen wrote:
On 8-10-2012 10:35, Jasper van de Gronde wrote:
On 07-10-12 21:05, Johan Engelen wrote:
On 7-10-2012 7:49, Tavmjong Bah wrote:
On Sat, 2012-10-06 at 22:26 +0200, Johan Engelen wrote:
Hi all, I've lost track of all the problems with powerstroke. Please send me again the bugs you have found (with a test file!) or the UI ideas we definitely need for release.
I have been working on "extrapolate by arcs matching path curvature", but I think it will take me too long to make that work reliably before release. There are still too many bumps along that road... I've committed the code, but it is disabled.
What is your problem with "extrapolate by arcs matching path curvature"? I've got a hacked version of Cairo that does the extrapolated line-join... but not properly (it only works at 100% zoom at the moment).
Determining the curvature is messy, have not found a good way to do that yet.
In principle, curvature is just the norm of the second derivative w.r.t. arc-length (if you want it signed, you'd probably just have to take the dot product with the unit normal, instead of the norm).
Of course, the trick is in the "arc-length" bit, is that where you're getting stuck? One trick you could try is taking an explicit formula like (x'*y'' - y'*x'')/(x'^2+y'^2)^(3/2) and approximating it with a polynomial (which doesn't require any values near the endpoints, where you'll usually get singularities and other problems), then evaluating the polynomial at the endpoints. I haven't tried it, so I'm not sure how well it would work, but my guess is that it could work pretty well.
I tried the norm of second derivative but I forgot about arc-length reparametrisation, thanks for the hint! Arc-length reparametrisation is already present in 2geom, so that is easy. Yes I need it 'signed', such that the touching circle is on the inside of the curve. I indeed get that from the normal, but the trick is to figure out which direction points inward for the normal! :-) For that I look at the direction of 2nd derivative w.r.t. the tangent.
And just now I find at function named "curvature" in 2geom... (although it has a todo comment that it is claimed incomplete...)
"Extrapolated arc" works much better with the improved curvature calculation (not sure whether it is really the curvature but OK :)). Now what is left is to fix the calculation for zero-length handles. Attached is a modified version of the "Choose your miter" file that I showed at LGM. In many cases, the difference between "Extrapolated" and "Extrapolated arc" is not very big. But there are things that one or the other can't do. For example, with "extrapolate" it is not possible to end up with a curving miter at the end of an almost straight line segment simply because the mirrored piece will be straight too instead of curved. Overall it seems that "Extrapolated arc" is easier to control and leads to nicer results, so I am tempted to pick that one by default.
Please play with it a bit and form an opinion.
I really hope someone comes up with better names for "Extrapolated" and "Extrapolated arc"
Cheers, Johan
