Hi,
unless there is a problem with the available space, I think it's best to keep the word "page" because the button is easier to understand that way and it's more consistend with the text above: "Page size" and "Page orientation".
I find "Fit page to selection" easier to understand than "Resize to fit selection".
Joc
Of course they should, and the page size drop-down should also be scrolled, if necessary, from a standard size to "custom" (this will be done automatically, hopefully, once you set a value to width/height spinbuttons). Aaron: I think in a previous email I described what needs to be done for this to happen automatically (you need to add a listener to root svg node).
- Should the word "canvas" replace with "page", to be
consistent with the
"Page size" and "Page orientation" just above? 3) Would it be more logical to have the button inside the "Custom Size" box?
Yes. Actually I don't even like the "fit" part either. What about "Resize to fit selection", and since it's inside "custom size" we don't even need to say _what_ to resize.
Note also that:
the "page size" menu has a big empty gap above the "custom", but when I scroll down, the gap disapear.
Yeah, it's a GTK "feature" that drives me crazy too. For some reason they decided that it's a smart way to open drop-downs so that the selected item is under mouse. Sometimes I wonder if GTK developers actually use any GTK software.
-- bulia byak Inkscape. Draw Freely. http://www.inkscape.org