(Oops forgot to cc list)<br><br>On Jan 24, 2008 12:41 PM, bulia byak &lt;<a href="mailto:buliabyak@...400..." target="_blank">buliabyak@...400...</a>&gt; wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="Ih2E3d">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Without trying the diff yet: smoothness is good but it&#39;s not the only<br>thing that matters. Sharp turns and corners, ideally, must be<br>recognized and created sharp, not smoothed out. How does your patch<br>compare to the current code in this respect?
<br></blockquote></div><div><br>this is the same code as is currently used.&nbsp; (i had written a different interpolation routine, but it turned out there was already one being used)&nbsp; The only difference is when it is applied.
<br><br>
&nbsp;</div><div class="Ih2E3d"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Also: maybe while you&#39;re at it, you could also add the tolerance
<br>slider to the controls bar of the tool, which is a very long-standing
<br>feature gap.<br></blockquote></div><div><br>a slider isn&#39;t appropriate as it stands, because there is no natural maximum value (ie it isn&#39;t a scale between 1-100%).<br><br>iirc, Adobe illustrator handles this by bounding the tolerance between .5-25 pixels.&nbsp; we can do the same, and then have a slider. it makes some sense to cap this value, since extremely high tolerances are not useful in practice.
<br></div></div>
</div><br>