On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Adam Giemza <adam.giemza@...173...> wrote:
Hi all,
any new progress on here? Or maybe any builds (I have a Mac now, so I could test Mac, Windows and Linux)?
Hi,
As I see nobody has tested the patch I 've sent before. The patch was getting obsolete because of developments on the main trunk. So I have prepared the new patch with some bug fixes (image file handling, JavaFX 1.1 support). The patch is in attachment.
About builds. Yes, I've made recent builds (r20792) for Windows and Linux: openSUSE 11.1 x86). Have no idea how to upload these builds for you, guys. And I am not sure as well that this is a correct way to distribute inkscape developments from my side. If you have proposals let me know.
I noticed in the very first exporter that it does not create this fxd packages but direct fx classes. Is there any difference except of the different handling inside JavaFX?
First I've tried to keep "no difference" status, and now they are "almost" the same. The difference is: FXZ archive may contain other graphic stuff, like bitmaps and fonts that can be referenced by FXD (SVG translated into JavaFX). But I consider the idea to use FXZ format (and "JavaFX Production Suite" infrastructure) more attractive. It allows clean separation between designer's and developer's work.
Hope I've answered your questions :)
Cheers, Sergey
Cheers, Adam