Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:09:49 -0700 (PDT) worms invasion <wormsxulla@...36...> kirjoitti:
I *am* on not-so-fast machine myself, and seeing so many "legacy" drawings being degraded this way is... awful. I just can't imagine all the people who will encounter the same experience, and what they will think about Inkscape.
What worries me, is that it will force everyone to use "better" or "best", when obviously they don't need it *really*, in fact. Not everyone uses advanced filters. Where is the benefit?
I can't, I really can't work on awful renderings like what 0.47 shows, and using a better filter quality puts my machine down. Inkscape has become unusable for me. The dramatic change in the "average quality" is a total turn off :-(
The current defaults (Blur quality: Average and Filter quality: Better) should give precisely the same results as 0.46 release with objects that haven't been rotated nor skewed and only slightly worse results with objects that have been rotated/skewed. Also, it should be at least as fast/slow as it was in 0.46.
The only problem I can see with this is that what is now called "Average" is lower quality that what 0.46 did call "Average"