On 1 October 2015 at 10:06, Josh Andler <scislac@...400...> wrote:

This is of concern to me. I thought glyph coverage was factored in before putting fonts up for vote. I incorrectly assumed that the fonts were vetted rather than just thrown in an available fonts pool.

I may be able to get the font expanded to support more scripts next year, but it would likely be 6-9 months from now until that work would be completed.