W dniu 7 sierpnia 2011 23:34 użytkownik Diederik van Lierop <mail@...1689...> napisał:
That would be a mess! There are simply to much possible snap sources and snap targets to give them all an individual toggle. Besides, we do not enable snapping bounding boxes to paths and vice-versa, see [1] for an explanation. This is what's being communicated by dividing the snap toggles in three groups. Although I agree that the snapping toggles could be more intuitive, I don't know of an easy solution that would fit all.
I'm not advocating snapping between bboxes and nodes, but I think that when you turn on the snap toggle for smooth nodes, they should both snap and be snapped to.
There's already a "snap to smooth-nodes". We could think of changing this into a "snap _from_ & to smooth-nodes".
Yes, exactly. Of course this doesn't always make sense (e.g. under the current framework, intersections can't really be a snap source), but for cases where it does, the behavior should be to turn them on both as snap sources and snap targets. This way we could also get rid of the rather unintuitive group controls (snap bboxes / snap nodes / snap other).
Regards, Krzysztof