17 May
2016
17 May
'16
1:47 a.m.
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 1:20 PM, C R <cajhne@...400...> wrote:
I tend to agree with this, even though it's not the default behaviour currently. Mainly because I want as few side-effects as possible in this action, and it's far easier to unlink the clones rather than link them all together again. Maybe we should group them together as well so they can be unlinked all at once if necessary?
While I'm not sure I agree with adding in clones to the mix, if that were the case I would agree that they should be grouped... but I honestly think it should be optional behavior to not take everything down to paths.
Cheers, Josh