Am 25.01.2017 um 19:41 schrieb Máirín Duffy:
Hi Eduard!
Thanks for the feedback! -
On 01/25/2017 01:35 PM, Eduard Braun wrote:
- A minor thing: "Pixel-based artwork" sounds a bit like pixel-art (which is not what this is about). Maybe call it "artwork based on dimensions given in pixels" or similar?
Yeh, I can see that being problematic. How about, "Digital Artwork" - the implied target for digital artwork in a screen which is pixels, right?
Sounds good (seeing that Martin also came up with it independently!). I'd not drop the pixels completely, maybe go with "Digital artwork (pixel-based)"?
- The two selections for "physical output" do not really well explain what the difference between them is. Both selections mention that they are for content that "needs to be accurate" but the accuracy we're talking about is obviously different in both
cases.
True, reusing accuracy as a concept might be confusing. The main decision: do you care more about the appearance of the artwork, or the real world scale of the artwork? To make that trade-off clearer, how about:
- "The appearance of elements such as clips, masks, and clones is most
important."
Maybe say "Faithful reproduction of elements [...]" (Appearance sounds a bit vague).
- "The accuracy of the physical unit size and position values of
objects in the file is most important."
As a non-native speaker of English I'd be struggling with "the physical unit size" (maybe make it more about physical unit sizes in the graphic), but I agree with the concept
Thanks, ~m