On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:37:33AM +0200, Niko Kiirala wrote:
Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:53:10 -0800 Jon Phillips <jon@...235...> kirjoitti:
Heya all, I stubbed out a space on our wiki to brainstorm about good ideas (which some have done on the wiki). Please take a chance to help motivate that wiki page, edit out the old 2006 ideas (as it is currently just that list), and come up with some stellar ideas:
http://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/index.php/Googles_Summer_Of_Code_2007
Anyway, the GSoC timeline is coming along quickly....fun!!!!
I'm here looking at the Finnish equivalent for GSoC called Kes?koodi organized by the Finnish Centre for Open Source Solutions (COSS)
I might me applying for Inkscape related project there. As I know the filters already, it propably would be most efficient to apply for filters-related project.
So, I'd like to hear some ideas, what should that project include. I am now working on feBlend filter primitive support, so don't propose that ;)
Here's a complete list of filters:
'feBlend' 'feColorMatrix' 'feComponentTransfer' 'feComposite' 'feConvolveMatrix' 'feDiffuseLighting' 'feDisplacementMap' 'feFlood' 'feGaussianBlur' 'feImage' 'feMerge' 'feMorphology' 'feOffset' 'feSpecularLighting' 'feTile' 'feTurbulence'
Anyone have thoughts on prioritization of these? Some like feMerge sound like they might be more useful later, while others like feOffset sound pretty easy and sound like they could directly enhance GaussianBlur. Others like feTile and feImage may not be as critical as other filters, since we currently have ways of tiling and inserting images.
Bryce