On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 05:17:28PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
I mean the function call in SVG::Metadata, as well as the tag. I also originally thought that "Author" would be clearer, but since the RDF has fields for creator, owner, and publisher, I thought it may be safer to match terms exactly.
Hm... with the addition of "publisher", it does start to seem strange to keep "author". "Creator" is probably more clear.
Hmm... Well, certainly I could handle keywords by splitting the subject on common delimiters like space, comma, etc. Feels kludgy though... But probably better than adding a new namespace. I suppose we could do that initially, and see how well it works, and if we need more, add something more sophisticated later.
Actually, the spec says it should be keywords:
Typically, a Subject will be expressed as keywords, key phrases or classification codes that describe a topic of the resource. Recommended best practice is to select a value from a controlled vocabulary or formal classification scheme.
(from http://dublincore.org/2003/03/24/dces)
actually, we could add "contributor" too... I think we could have multiple. :)