Thanks!<br><br>About dynastroke lpe, I ponder if it&#39;s a goood idea to include in any release at all!<br><br>In other words, I doubt doing this as lpe is the good way to go. We definitely need to have path with variable and editable width as full inscape citizen, i.e. regular inkscape objects.<br>
A simple menu to convert a regular path to a enhenced one would then be more powerfull than the actual lpe.<br><br>However, if we release it and for compatibility reasons, we would have to maintain this lpe for ever, although it became useless...<br>
<br>I think the best way to go is to develop such enhenced paths in 2geom, with basic edition capabilities, and then import them into inkscape as regular objects.<br>(this is one reason why I did not try to polish it at all and left it quiet experimental).<br>
<br>Developping the dynastroke lpe was not useless however: <br>1- we can still play with it although we know it won&#39;t be here for ever, (but I think we should not release it)<br>2- as a first prototype, it did help me clarify some ideas about the way &#39;dynamic paths&#39; should be done in 2geom.<br>
<br>Do other agree? Johan?<br><br>Cheers, jfb.<br>