Quick answer without looking at the code. Perhaps it is a bug related to how paths are stored vs. how LPE path params are stored. One with the y-flip transform, the other without. Just a guess.
- Johan

On 8-5-2014 7:16, Papoj Thamjaroenporn wrote:

Notice, however, that both ways yield the expected results. It’s just the *display* of the linked path param that is incorrectly inverted here.

Regards.

_______________________
Papoj "Hua" Thamjaroenporn
pt2277@...3110...

On May 7, 2014, at 6:11 AM, Papoj Thamjaroenporn <papojt@...3117...> wrote:

Dear all,

I’m a little puzzled at this. Does anyone know why when we define path param by linking, the resulting path param is inverted? Compared to pasted path, the resulting param path’s orientation remains the same. An example using Bend Path LPE is shown below. This behavior happens to other LPEs that use path param as well.

<Screen Shot 2014-05-07 at 6.05.55 AM.png><Screen Shot 2014-05-07 at 6.06.03 AM.png>

Also, does anyone know if we can restrict the path param to link / copy path’s control points *exactly* at the same locations as it’s drawn? Thank you.

Regards,

_______________________
Papoj "Hua" Thamjaroenporn
episer@...400...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out:
&#149; 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
&#149; Requirements for releasing software faster
&#149; Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce
_______________________________________________
Inkscape-devel mailing list
Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel