1 Feb
2012
1 Feb
'12
9:06 p.m.
2012/1/21 Tim Cuthbertson <tim@...2743...>:
So, I guess my questions are: - am I wrong about my conclusions here? I've looked at the source, but may have missed something.
I think you are right. There was recently some work to get us more in line with XDG specifications for user directories, but it was not as thorough as it should be.
- is there any interest in extending the extension loading mechanism to support loading extensions across all $XDG_DATA_DIRS? Presumably this would be implemented for _all_ data types (gradients, icons, etc) as well as just extensions.
There is some interest (as in, "we need to do that eventually") but I think no one is actively working on it at the moment.
Regards, Krzysztof