18 Dec
2004
18 Dec
'04
7:50 p.m.
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 14:26:24 -0500, MenTaLguY <mental@...3...> wrote:
You know, this does raise a more important question: should we just go ahead and show all layers in the selector?
Not all layers, but all siblings of the ancestor of the current.
The only reason I'm hesitant to was out of concern it might get unnavigably large with a large document, but in the most common case (only top-level layers) it'll be as large as it can get anyway.
If you have too many layers, just group them into a tree. Not seeing layers in the parallel branches of the tree will is I think a good compromise between "show all" and the current behavior.