On Mon, 2021-05-24 at 14:42 -0500, Ted Gould wrote:
On May 24 2021, at 10:13 am, Martin Owens doctormo@geek-2.com wrote:
On Mon, 2021-05-24 at 09:42 -0500, Ted Gould wrote:
I would say that is human parsable, but the URLs end up being
gallery
entries. Not really a directory listing.
https://inkscape.org/gallery/item/26934/inkscape-1.1-x64.7z I imagine that's what makes it harder to find in scripts and the such. For instance, debian files have look-ups that can take
simple
regexs, but couldn't include gallery IDs.
Do the debian scripts accept 3XX redirects?
I would imagine the Debian tools would, as they're rather sophisticated, but once you'd gotten to that point you're really not making it "simple" anymore.
Well sure, it's got to have redirects, otherwise the files have to be named 'just-so' with contexts beyond that's available. i.e. we'd have to let people upload raw files to the server and then let people download uncached files (which we don't want to do)
If they can accept 301 redirects, then it's possible to put together a version of the flat page that just gives you predictable links. What link pattern would you like?
Martin,