What about just 0.50, if 0.5 doesn't work? We would come to that anyway soon enough.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Guillermo Espertino (Gez) <gespertino@...400...> wrote:
El 24/10/13 11:22, Alex Valavanis escribió:
@Guillermo - Version numbers aren't decimals. The period separates major & minor release identifiers. i.e., "0.9" is "major = 0, minor = 9", so it is lower than the current "major = 0, minor = 48" releases. 0.91 was suggested instead of 0.90 to avoid this possible confusion.
I understand, but notice how users (like me, for instance) read it :-)
For regular people used to decimals, 0.5 is halfway to 1, and 0.5 is more than 0.48.
Anyway, I get it and what Krzysztof pointed out about package managers makes my entire point moot.
Just wanted to comment about a potential communication issue with users. From this side, jumping from 0.49 to 0.91 is... wtf :.p
Gez.
October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135991&iu=/4140/ostg.clk... _______________________________________________ Inkscape-devel mailing list Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel