On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 09:44:01AM +0200, Ralf Stephan wrote:
mental:
Okay, whoever decided to derive a view class from Gtk::Window ... that was NOT a good idea.
I do not understand. How would this class "derive" from Gtk::Window?
class View { public:
View(); virtual ~View();
It took a bit of research to figure out what he was talking about. It turns out he was looking at an unused piece of code - the old Edit class. Prior to the SPDesktop refactoring work that you took over, we'd attempted a wholesale replacement of SPDesktop with the Edit class, however it proved difficult to integrate it due to its dependency on View, thus the change of strategy using the SPDesktop refactoring approach.
If there is anything useful to you in the Edit class, go ahead and copy it, otherwise delete it and replace it with your own SPDesktop refactoring work.
The build is broken until this gets fixed...
Why fix it if you got the fact wrong?
Is this a joke or way too much over my head?
I was wondering this as well.
Bryce