Hi Bulia, Thanks for the quick fix for the command line rendering of the test files, much appreciated.
I would prefer not to make the images larger, the current size is based on the size of the majority of the test png images from the w3c webpage. I have scaled down the few images that where larger now using Gimp so hopefully the image quality is better.
Fix the broken image problem, my svg generation script was being to clever for its own good :)
Anyway, if you want I can make the png images links to the w3c original testimages, that what you at least have access to the higher resolution version for those images who have such. Or I can make it a link to the html harnessed testpage. Tell me what you prefer.
Sincerely, Christian
On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 17:09 -0300, bulia byak wrote:
Christian,
Thanks for updating the test page with Inkcape CVS renderings. I have a few comments:
- Can you make the images larger? It's difficult to compare in such
small size. If the page has to scroll horizontally I think it's OK.
- The W3C images are scaled in the browser, which makes them look ugly
and makes comparing with Inkscape's AA images more difficult. Can you prescale them with AA?
- Inkscape renderings show "broken image" often. I just tested
masking-path-04-b, struct-image-01-t and render-groups-01-b, they show correct imported bitmaps for me in Inkscape, both in GUI and in commandline rendering. Can you check what's wrong with your setup to fix this?