3 Apr
2004
3 Apr
'04
5:35 p.m.
Good catch - why don't you go ahead and set it up to build by default. I suspect the only reason it isn't is because it's still kind of new.
Thanks, Bryce
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, Kees Cook wrote:
Is there a reason why "inkjar" is not built by default? I looked through the archives, and it wasn't mentioned. Also, there do not appear to be any excessive dependencies for compiling it (zlib isn't a "strange" dependency, IMHO).
Just curious!