22 Apr
2004
22 Apr
'04
1:42 a.m.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 09:47:44AM -0500, Bob Jamison wrote:
Although we would lose the idea of having a set of libs,
Nothing changes about what .a libs we build (src/libnr/libnr.a etc.).
For those who still want to have their lib buildable and testable by itself [for unit testing]
The existing unit test framework remains. (We may move some of utest.h to a .cpp file now that we can depend on things in other directories, and we can get rid of the check-recursive: all-recursive hack.)
See also the discussion on convenience stub makefiles, elsewhere in this thread.
Are these provisions already sufficient to address concern re unit-testing?
pjrm.