On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 17:46 -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
Incidentally, as far as DSCMs go, I'd personally recommend either git or mercurial. git is more robust (I would prefer to keep our core history in git format) and has better analysis tools (which I've come to rely on heavily), but mercurial is much less user-hostile.
Have you had a chance to play with bazaar much?
No, I hadn't. Until recently, the general consensus on the web about bzr had been "don't bother". It was generally so ill-considered that I didn't even bother evaluating it when I did the giant SCM bake-off a while back.
However, reviewing the consensus on the web today, it seems that it has improved enough in recent months that people are now rating it just behind git and mercurial. So I will give it a spin.
-mental