![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/516640127f084752aaf5f23c7119f1be.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 00:26 -0300, VinÃcius dos Santos Oliveira wrote:
I think this is a matter of personal preferences. As long as the tool is customizable, there shouldn't be any problems.
'hard to use' is NOT just another way of saying 'Not my preference'. Hard to use can mean hard to use. The only way you can know for sure is by employing UX design principles and carrying out experiments with users.
git is a old project and old projects
Not that old:
git - 2005 (april) <- BitKeeper [perl/bash/tcl/C] hg - 2005 (april) <- BitKeeper [python/C] bzr - 2005 (march) <- baz <- arch [python/pyrex/C] svn - 2000 (octob) <- cvs [C] cvs - 1990 (novem) [C]
As you can see, something happened in 2005; you get 100 FSF points for knowing what, and why it's such an awesome example of why proprietary tools are bad for you ;-)
Martin,