On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 09:11:23AM -0800, Krzysztof Kosiński wrote:
An advantage of GitHub that was not mentioned here is Travis CI, which allows to run unit tests before merging every branch.
Right. I did actually mention that - I do remember that was a key point in its favor ("github's CI was seen as a huge pro last time we looked"). But gitlab has improved in this particular area, and also shows that we're dealing with moving targets, and weight feature-by-feature comparisons knowing a deficiency today may not exist tomorrow.
Bryce
GitLab also has a CI solution, but its public runner servers do not support C++ - we would need to self-host that part.
Best regards, Krzysztof
On Jan 6, 2017 01:42, "Martin Owens" <doctormo@...400...> wrote:
On Fri, 2017-01-06 at 10:24 +0100, Olof Bjarnason wrote:
What about moving one small repo to github and another to gitlab so more eyeballs get to see both?
I see that metric as a bit biased. We know Github is the monopoly de- jure, so just by force of numbers it'll discount any other concerns or benefits in favour of one.
Do we really have a lack of eyeballs? Inkscape is insanely popular already. What we need is better tools, not just the most popular one.
Martin,
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Inkscape-devel mailing list Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel