27 Feb
2007
27 Feb
'07
6:33 p.m.
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:07:57 +0100, "David Douard" <david.douard@...400...> wrote:
Another solution might me to use Mercurial. It is very similar (in goals and day to day use) to git.
Mercurial is nice -- I've been using it on one project where I'm collaborating with people from a company where it is the standard SCM. For a user accustomed to git, it's similar-but-different-enough to be disorienting at first, but I appreciated it once I got comfortable with it.
That said, I am starting to really miss some features from git, including:
- multiple branches in one repository (with recent mercurial, possible, but not nice at all) - not having to type full repository paths all the time for pulls/pushes - grafts
-mental