28 Mar
2009
28 Mar
'09
midnight
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 2:53 AM, bulia byak wrote:
It's really a pity that so much work has gone into a feature which is not SVG-compliant...
I have always wondered if we can do compatibility-wise safe extensions to plain SVG for serious things like aforementioned advanced gradient fill types. It really is a pity that it takes so much time to do standards revisions.
Alexandre