On 01/07/06, jiho <jo.irisson@...400...> wrote:
On 01 Jul 2006, at 15:07 , Ben Fowler wrote:
[ snip ]
That is true and to compile Inkscape on OS X you need Fink unstable anyway ...
J-o, I have, for a long time, been wondering about the correctness of the "A full unstable fink installation" which occurs on our CompilingMacOsX page.
[ snip] ... as Inkscape definitely needs some packages from unstable, I just switched completely to unstable. ... adding manually a package from unstable implies moving some info files around and I didn't want to ....
...I think in the end it is just a matter of taste. I personally don't like moving info files around and need many packages that are only in unstable.
I think that that is the answer. I am happy moving the .info and .patch files. The wiki page simply needs to say that a switch to unstable for Inkscape development is going to mean less upheaval overall, but is not the only possibility.
Ben