25 Jun
2006
25 Jun
'06
6:23 p.m.
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 13:29:57 -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
Yet 2.8 has been out a while, and has some new capabilities that would be nice to rely on. 2.8 would be more compelling of a change than 2.6,
What capabilities are those? Is it really worth leaving some users behind?
I'd like to propose that we change the dependency requirements for Inkscape to 2.8. Doing this right now gives us a maximum amount of testing time before 0.45.
The alternative may be to have a baseline of 2.4 but use the newer 2.8 features where available. This assumes that the features are all "nice to have but not essential".
thanks -mike