On Fri, 2004-12-03 at 09:20 -0800, Jon A. Cruz wrote:
Jon Phillips wrote:
Yeah, maybe the more important task at hand is to do what our mission says which is to be a SVG compliant editor. Maybe the more important thinking is that (and maybe we can loosely agree to this):
0.50 would be SVG Tiny (this is a general thinking overall thing)
1.0 would be full SVG 1.2 compliancy (both rendering and editing)
Hmmm... since the spec is still not even final, I'm wondering a bit about the 1.2 targeting for 1.0. Perhaps 1.0 might target full SVG 1.1 support, then have 1.5 or 2.0 embrace SVG 2.0.
Yes, that sounds more reasonable.
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Inkscape-devel mailing list Inkscape-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel