On 20-11-2014 22:53, Josh Andler wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Johan Engelen <jbc.engelen@...2592...> wrote:
If we keep it in: I'm all for another name. It is just a suggestion from the technical creator. If people have other ideas, that'd be great. Technically, (iirc), the parameter sets the 'beta' for the whole curve.
If kept in and the SVG name changes, doesn't that break it for the previous users?
Yes, good point. :( I guess the only thing it would change is that there would be a workaround for those people (manually change the name in svg). The whole "temporary johan" tryout thing was very dumb. I'm sorry for that.
A potential problem is that it is the only interpolator that needs a parameter. If we create another interpolator that needs a parameter, I'm not sure if the current thing is set up well for that.
So additional parameters aren't really future-proof? Would that be for the beta type or any other existing/future interpolators?
It just that I have not thought about it. The SVG-name now is "interpolator_beta". That may or may not work for the other interpolator parameters. Worse, the current system forces all interpolator parameters like that to share the same UI name: "Smoothness" currently.
-Johan